Article 5 - For Prison Law Practitioners
Data Law Limited
Summary
- Tutor is available to students
Overview
Learning Outcomes
- On completion of this course you will:
- • Understand the grounds on which someone can and cannot be deprived of their liberty
- • Be aware of the procedural safeguards for Article 5
- • Have considered examples of how Article 5 can be used in practise with reference to case law from the ECHR
- • Feel confident when handling prison law cases involving Article 5
What is the target audience?
- Prison law practitioners of all levels including paralegals, trainees and qualified solicitors
Description
Article 5 of the Human Rights Act concerns the right to liberty and security and focuses on protecting an individual’s freedom from unreasonable detention. In short, individuals have a right to personal freedom and must not be imprisoned or detained without good reason.
During this 15-minute session prison law expert Dean Kingham of Swain & Co will predominately discuss Article 5 (4), the key section for prison law practitioners, and will offer guidance on how to utilise this section when challenging prison detention.
Consideration will be given to the right to compensation under Article 5 (5); Dean will explore the impact of the breakthrough case of Osborn, Booth and Reilly, namely the increase in oral hearings and the subsequent delay in these hearings being held due insufficient parole board personnel recruitment.
In addition, Dean will discuss some interesting case law from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) relating to Article 5:
• HL v United Kingdom (45508/99) – The informal admission to a psychiatric hospital of a compliant but incapacitated adult breached Article 5
• Steven Neary v LB Hillingdon [2011] - By keeping Stephen away from his home, Hillingdon breached Article 8 and Article 5(1)
• S., V. and A. v. Denmark (35553) - Detention of football supporters for approximately eight hours without charge, with a view to preventing violence
• Ilnseher v Germany (10211/2012) - Preventative detention of a murderer
• Alpay v Turkey (16538/17) - State of emergency posed a significant challenge to the safeguarding of fundamental rights and civil liberties with the defendant’s pre-trial detention breaching Articles 5, 10 and 18
Questions and answers
Currently there are no Q&As for this course. Be the first to ask a question.
Reviews
Currently there are no reviews for this course. Be the first to leave a review.
Legal information
This course is advertised on reed.co.uk by the Course Provider, whose terms and conditions apply. Purchases are made directly from the Course Provider, and as such, content and materials are supplied by the Course Provider directly. Reed is acting as agent and not reseller in relation to this course. Reed's only responsibility is to facilitate your payment for the course. It is your responsibility to review and agree to the Course Provider's terms and conditions and satisfy yourself as to the suitability of the course you intend to purchase. Reed will not have any responsibility for the content of the course and/or associated materials.